Dmitry Gunko: "I'm disappointed that no one from Urartu was called up to the Armenian national team"

The head coach of Yerevan's Urartu, Dmitry Gunko, expressed his disappointment after the final match of the season regarding the absence of any of his players in the Armenian national team call-up list.

"I'm disappointed and surprised that not a single player from our team has been called up to the Armenian national team. I understand the deep problems of Armenian football," said Gunko at the post-match press conference.

His statement sparked a strong reaction — especially given that several Urartu players could realistically strengthen the national team both in the short and long term. Let's take a look at who.

Who from Urartu deserved a call-up?

Khariton Ayvazyan (right-back)
In the second half of the season, 22-year-old Ayvazyan became one of the key players in Urartu's defense. Considering the current right-backs in the national team — Gevorg Ohanyan and Varazdat Haroyan — the absence of a younger, more promising player with strong current form is puzzling. Ayvazyan could have increased competition now and become a long-term solution.

Erik Piloyan (centre-back)
A versatile defender who can play both centrally and wide. Already has experience with the national team. He was consistent throughout the 2024/25 season and at least deserved a preliminary call-up.

Zhirayr Margaryan (left-back)
Not inferior to Edgar Grigoryan, who was called up instead. The coaching staff may have opted for the more experienced player, but Margaryan remains a competitive option for the future.

Narek Agasaryan (defensive midfielder)
A regular starter throughout the season, with 2 goals and 4 assists. One of the few holding midfielders showing progress and consistency. His absence is especially notable given the national team's general lack of players in this position.

Karen Melkonyan (forward)
A striking example of versatility: two years ago he was a right-back, now he's Urartu's top striker. Became the starting center-forward in the second half of the season, scoring 10 goals and providing 2 assists. He has played for the national team before and is currently in the best form of his career. Given the attacking shortage, his omission is hard to explain.

Nihcolas Kaloukian (forward)
Though he received less playing time towards the end of the season, Kaloukian has a rare physical and technical profile for Armenian football: holds up the ball well, strong in aerial duels, and plays well with his back to goal. The national squad has only two pure strikers, neither of whom offer his unique qualities. Kaloukian could be a valuable tactical option in tough matches.

Erik Simonyan (centre-back)
Had a strong start to the season but later lost his starting place. His absence is understandable due to his lack of recent game rhythm.

The absence of Urartu players in the Armenian national team truly raises questions. The team finished third in the league, displayed organized football, and developed several interesting talents. Throughout the season, Urartu used the most Armenian players in its lineup — all of whom were club academy products.